What Does This Hateful for Sandy Bridge Owners?

If we look at the data from the everyman quality presets tested at 1080p across the 11 games in this article, nosotros detect that the overclocked 2600K was 27% slower than the overclocked 8700K when comparing the average frame rate, or you could say that the 8700K was 37% faster.

This is true of both the average frame rate and ane% low result. On boilerplate, the overclocked 2600K was also only able to lucifer the stock 4770K and was therefore beaten by the stock 7600K. That said, in games such as Battlefield i, the 2600K still provided a better experience when compared to the quad-core Cadre i5 processor.

For those gaming at what is probably a more realistic resolution, the overclocked 2600K was merely 17% slower than the 8700K when comparison the 1% low results and that's still a pretty big margin to be honest, especially given how heavily limited the 8700K was. The 2600K was just ten% slower when comparing the boilerplate frame rate but really it's those i% low results that gamers will detect the virtually.

Our Conclusion

What does this mean for you lot if y'all're a Core i7-2600K owner? Currently, probably non a lot. If yous're running a graphics menu that's equal to or slower than the GTX 1070, yous don't really need to do annihilation for now assuming y'all've overclocked that sucker to at to the lowest degree 4.5GHz.

At its stock clock speeds, the 2600K will often limit performance of a GTX 1070 or Vega 56 graphics card, and so exist aware of that. With a GTX 1060 or RX 580 though you'll have no such problem.

Overclocked, the 2600K averaged 140fps in Battlefield 1 and a GTX 1070 is skillful for around 115fps with the 8700K, then for the most part you should be okay. In Call of Duty WWII, the GTX 1070 offers 133fps on boilerplate with an 8700K while the overclocked 2600K managed 134fps with the 1080 Ti, so you're certainly on the border with the 2600K and GTX 1070 combo.

If y'all're playing the latest and greatest titles on an overclocked 2600K with a GTX 1080 or better, so you're without question restricting the GPU'due south performance. Of class, the 2600K is now a seven year sometime CPU so the fact that it'south slowing up high-cease GPUs probably should be that surprising.

Sandy Bridge has fared well over the years, better than whatever CPU architecture we've seen earlier, just we're now at the end of the road. The final generation of GPUs will likely see budget mid-range GPUs finding the limits of the 2600K and at that point it will certainly exist worth upgrading.

Shopping shortcuts:

  • Core i5-8400 on Newegg, Amazon
  • Core i7-8700K on Newegg, Amazon
  • Ryzen 5 1600 on Newegg, Amazon
  • Ryzen seven 1700 on Newegg, Amazon

Sill, if you lot're serious about your games and you lot play titles such every bit Battlefield 1 and Call of Duty WWII so I strongly propose you look at upgrading to an eighth-gen Cadre processor or 2022's best value option, the Ryzen 5 1600.